STUDY DESIGNS AND METHODS

What Is a Feasibility Study?

Guide · 1 min read · Last updated 2026-10-31

A feasibility study asks whether a planned study or intervention can be carried out, and under what conditions, before a full study is designed. It is broader than a pilot: it may examine whether the research question is worth pursuing, whether the intervention is acceptable, and whether the resources exist.

Feasibility versus pilot

Authors use these terms differently. A common distinction is:

  • Feasibility study: asks whether the main study can be done (can we recruit, measure, retain participants; is the intervention acceptable?). It may not use the planned design.
  • Pilot study: a smaller version of the main study that runs the same procedures, including randomisation if the main study is a trial.

Always define what you mean in your protocol and report.

Typical questions

AreaExample questions
RecruitmentHow many eligible patients are there? What proportion agree?
ProceduresCan staff deliver the intervention as designed?
MeasurementAre data complete and reliable?
AcceptabilityDo participants and staff find it acceptable?
ResourcesWhat time, staff and cost are needed?

Illustrative example

Invented for teaching. A research team wants to run a trial of a telephone-based diabetes coaching programme. A feasibility study interviews 15 patients and 5 nurses, records how many patients are eligible in clinic, and tests the coaching scripts for 6 weeks. It finds that evening calls are preferred and that a third of patients lack a reliable phone, which informs the design of the trial.

Common pitfalls

  • Using "feasibility" to justify a small, underpowered study of effectiveness.
  • Not defining success criteria in advance.

Key takeaways

  • The question is "can it be done?", not "does it work?".
  • Mixed methods (numbers and interviews) are often useful.
  • Define progression criteria beforehand.

References and further reading

  1. Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady D, Newman TB. Designing Clinical Research. 4th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. Link
  2. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332. doi:10.1136/bmj.c332
  3. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200-207. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201301080-00007

Related reading

This page is general educational information about research methods. It is not medical, legal or regulatory advice; follow your institution's ethics board and your target journal's instructions.