JOURNALS PUBLISHING AND PEER REVIEW

How to Identify Predatory Journals

Guide · 2 min read · Last updated 2026-10-31

Predatory (or deceptive) journals charge fees without providing genuine peer review and editorial services, and often misrepresent their indexing, metrics and editors. You can spot most of them with a short, systematic check before submitting.

Warning signs

  • Unsolicited emails with flattery, rapid-publication promises or invitations to submit.
  • Very fast acceptance or "peer review in days" with no real reviewer comments.
  • Unclear or hidden fees, or fees requested before review.
  • Vague scope or a title that mimics a well-known journal.
  • Fake or misleading metrics, unrecognised indexing claims, or invented "impact factors".
  • No named editors, an editorial board with people who are unaware they are listed, or no contact information.
  • Poor quality articles, with language errors, nonsense content or plagiarism.
  • No clear policies on ethics, retraction, copyright or archiving.

Verification steps

  1. Use the Think. Check. Submit. checklist.
  2. Check whether the journal is listed in DOAJ if it claims open access.
  3. Verify claimed indexing in the NLM Catalog and PubMed, rather than trusting the journal's website.
  4. Look up the publisher and editors independently.
  5. Ask a mentor or librarian.
  6. Read recent articles for quality.

No list is perfect: absence from a list does not prove a journal is predatory, and presence does not prove it is good, so combine the checks.

If you have already submitted

Withdraw in writing before publication if you have concerns, keep records, and do not pay fees you did not agree to. Seek advice from your institution's library or research office.

Illustrative example

Invented for teaching. A student receives an email promising publication in 5 days for a fee. The website lists an "impact factor" with no provider, the editor names do not appear in any university directory, and the NLM Catalog has no record. She declines and chooses a journal recommended by her mentor.

Common pitfalls

  • Relying on one list.
  • Paying "to speed up" review.

Key takeaways

  • Check indexing, editors, fees and policies independently.
  • When in doubt, do not submit or pay.

References and further reading

  1. Think. Check. Submit. Checklist for choosing a trusted journal. Link
  2. Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). Link
  3. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): guidance and flowcharts. Link
  4. National Library of Medicine. MEDLINE overview. Link

Related reading

This page is general educational information about research methods. It is not medical, legal or regulatory advice; follow your institution's ethics board and your target journal's instructions.