How to Conduct Research in Family Medicine
Family medicine research studies health and care in community and primary care settings, where patients present early, with undifferentiated problems and multiple conditions. Good questions concern frequency, care processes, continuity, prevention and patient experience, and they are often answered with practice data, surveys or mixed methods.
Question types
- Prevalence and burden of conditions seen in primary care.
- Diagnostic pathways: how symptoms are evaluated and when referral occurs.
- Prevention and screening uptake, including barriers and facilitators.
- Chronic disease care: adherence, monitoring, multimorbidity.
- Patient experience and communication: qualitative or mixed methods.
- Health services: access, continuity, telehealth.
Designs and data
- Cross-sectional surveys of patients or clinicians.
- Practice-based cohort or record reviews with data quality checks.
- Qualitative interviews to understand perspectives.
- Quality improvement cycles with careful ethics decisions.
- Reviews of primary-care interventions.
Practical considerations
- Data quality: primary-care records may be incomplete or coded inconsistently; plan validation.
- Sampling: define the practice population and avoid selection bias.
- Engagement: involve patients and practice staff early; respect workload.
- Ethics and privacy: follow local rules on data access and consent.
Illustrative example
Invented for teaching. "What proportion of adults aged 50 to 70 registered in two practices had a record of colorectal cancer screening in the past two years, and what reasons do patients give for not participating?" Design: cross-sectional record review plus a short survey, with ethics approval.
Making a primary care project realistic
Primary care teams are busy, so keep data requests small and agree a timeline that fits their schedule. A brief pilot with a few records or a short survey shows what is feasible before you commit to a larger sample. Offer to give the practice a one-page summary of your findings, which also helps maintain goodwill for future projects.
Common pitfalls
- Over-reliance on diagnosis codes without validating.
- Burdening practices with long data requests.
Key takeaways
- Choose questions grounded in everyday primary care.
- Plan data quality, sampling, engagement and ethics.
References and further reading
- Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady D, Newman TB. Designing Clinical Research. 4th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. Link
- von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806-808. doi:10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
- EQUATOR Network: Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (reporting guideline library). Link
Related reading
This page is general educational information about research methods. It is not medical, legal or regulatory advice; follow your institution's ethics board and your target journal's instructions.
